Quality checklist for comparing plan revisions

This checklist helps teams document results from visual PDF comparison in a reproducible, project-ready way.

Before the comparison

Is it clear which version is reference (A) and which is new (B)?
Are page size, order, and orientation comparable?
Are filenames unambiguous (date, index, status)?
Are there known export changes that may cause visual noise?

During the comparison

Was standard mode used first and only adjusted when needed?
Are markers reviewed technically, not only visually?
Are critical pages prioritized (safety, cost, schedule)?
Are text changes assessed separately from graphical changes?

After the comparison

Are relevant findings documented with page references?
Is it clear which differences are accepted and which require follow-up?
Were exports and notes stored in the project filing system?
Is the approval decision traceable for third parties?

Recommendation: Make this checklist a fixed step in your revision and approval process.

Short template for internal reporting

Compared files: Reference A / New B
Reviewed by: Name, date, project
Checked pages: List or range
Critical deviations: Yes/No + reference
Approval recommendation: Release / Query / Correction required